The first 3 persistent content bottlenecks I saw again in every company
The end of the year always brings a specific rhythm. First there is the big rush to finish campaigns, catalogs, publications and updates on time. Then space appears. The pressure drops. Teams wrap up files, clean up folders, close projects and try to move toward January with a clearer mind. In that slower moment you see what stayed hidden during the year.
This year I carried out many content scans in companies of all sizes and sectors. B2B environments, retail organizations, international brands, technical products, lifestyle. These organizations differ a lot, yet I keep seeing the same patterns. Teams do not fail. Their way of working grew in a world that is now more complex, faster and more demanding.
In this end-of-year series I share the six bottlenecks I saw most often. I start at the bottom of the list. Next month I share the top three.
#6 – The ad hoc workflow (and how recognisable it is)
When we do a new content scan somewhere, we almost always see the same basic pattern: content arises through a combination of goodwill, improvisation and quick switching. For years this works fine, until the organization grows, the number of channels increases, several markets are added or the pressure on consistency rises. Then friction begins.
Workflows run through emails, loose chats, phone calls, Teams messages, Excel files that were once meant to be temporary, screenshots with feedback and versions that circulate in different folders at the same time. A document is called “final” but sits in a place where only one person has access. Deadlines shift. Corrections disappear. And no one can say exactly at what moment something goes wrong, only that it goes wrong.
A pattern we see coming back so often. That is not unusual, because it happens when a content supply chain grows without the underlying process growing with it.
An ad hoc workflow is workable as long as the organization is small. But in a context where content needs to serve multiple channels, countries, languages and formats, such a way of working becomes very costly and increasingly hard to control. A content scan exposes that very sharply, and that awareness alone brings calm and overview.
#5 – “We are constantly under pressure, but we do not always know why.”
This sentence appears in almost every conversation. Teams run at full speed, but have little insight into how work piles up, which tasks consume most time, or where work disappears into searching, rewriting or redoing. The result is a permanent feeling of pressure without clarity about the cause.
The demand for content keeps growing. But the way that content is made has hardly evolved. Many teams keep pushing, pulling, reacting, putting out fires. And as long as no one really has an overview of the full chain (from briefing to publication) it feels as if everything comes in at once and everything is urgent.
When we map a full content supply chain, a similar pattern usually appears: an enormous amount of time is lost to pure friction. Not so much to the creation of content, but to everything around it: searching, waiting, repeating questions, missing context, translations being made again, data living in different places, corrections running through each other.
A content scan not only shows where time disappears, but also where you can take time back without working harder. Often even with less effort.
#4 – No governance or ownership: everyone does their best, but no one manages the whole
Governance sounds abstract, but you feel very quickly when it is missing. It is one of the most recurring findings during our content scans: data lives in different places, images are managed by whoever has time, texts are rewritten by people who actually should not do that, translations are spread across documents, and new colleagues get lost in folders that have grown historically without logic. Tools usually are there. Often very good ones. But without ownership no one is truly responsible for the whole.
And that makes every new project dependent on coincidences: who is available at that moment, who has the right version, who still follows an old workflow, who knows where what sits.
Governance is not about extra rules, but about creating clarity.
- • Who manages product data?
- • Who approves content?
- • Who guards branding and versions?
- • Where does the truth live?
- • Which steps happen where in the content supply chain?
Once that clarity exists, pressure drops and quality rises, almost automatically.
To conclude
If you recognize yourself in one of these three points, I want to stress this: you’re in good company. These are not exceptions, these are patterns I have seen in almost every organization in 2025. Not because teams are doing something wrong, but because content production has grown many times faster than the underlying processes.
And the good news is: once you have insight into these bottlenecks, you can start building a scalable content operation. Calmer, more consistent, more efficient, without driving up the pressure on people.
Next month I will share part 2 of this end-of-year list: the top three bottlenecks. And believe me: number 1 is the one every organization feels, but rarely dares to name out loud.
If you want to take a look at your current content supply chain together in the meantime, I am happy to think along.
Geerte Verbraeken
Win the
battle of the brands
Start met visuele content automation
